Posts Categorised: Deep Dig
Do Hawaii and New Jersey have the right to do so?
WASHINGTON — Hawaii and New Jersey are the latest states to decree that all state agencies should only do business with internet service providers agreeing to follow net neutrality principles, joining Montana and New York. Hawaii, New Jersey and New York are among the 23 states where the attorneys general are suing the FCC for repealing net neutrality rules put in place in 2015.
One important question is like the 800 lb gorilla in the room though: do states have the right to create their own Internet policy? Markham Erickson, the telecom attorney representing Incompas , the industry association for competitive communications carriers, said the FCC may have “backed itself into a corner on the states’ rights issue,” according to lightreading.com . While the FCC said individual states couldn’t override federal policy, it also renounced its own authority to impose net neutrality provisions, which would appear to leave the door open for states to impose them if they so choose.
In Congress, Representative Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) has introduced a bill banning blocking and throttling of Internet traffic, but leaving in place the possibility for paid prioritization, and maintaining the categorization of ISPs as Title 1 information service providers, which are regulated by the FTC rather than the FCC. Blackburn also calls for continued limitations on the FCC to preempt state net neutrality laws, according to the same article. Representative Mike Coffman (R-Co.) says he will introduce a net neutrality bill that would go further than Blackburn’s proposal: Coffman wants to ensure blocking, throttling and paid prioritization are all illegal, and he wants to create a compromise in how ISPs are regulated that would keep them under FCC oversight, but not subject them to Title II governance.
The FCC’s “Restoring Internet Freedom Act” will likely get published in the Federal Register in the coming weeks, after which there will be a 60-day period before the order goes into effect. Any lawsuits are likely to take one to two years before they’re granted a decision by a federal court, and the party which disagrees with the outcome will likely take the issue to the Supreme Court.
It’s too early to tell what the end result will be, we’re anxious to answer this question
OSLO — One of the advantages radio has over the years had with respect to other services like Pandora, Spotify (and other online sources) is that everyone already had one or more radios in their homes or cars.
Now, though, with the ubiquitous presence of smartphones, that advantage is gone, with the possible exception of inside the car.
So the question must be posed: Why would you force all of your listeners throw out all the radios they already have and buy a new one? How many of them will bother? That’s the operative question as we watch the results of the FM switch off in Norway. By the way — though it’s too early to tell what the end result will be, we’re anxious to answer this question and I, for one, can’t help but pour over the initial findings.
“The number of weekly listeners is almost the same as before the switch off. However, the number of daily listeners is down by 463000, according to listening figures just published for January 2018,” reports Radio.no . The Director of Digital Radio Norway, Ole Jørgen Torvmark, thinks that since there are fewer radios in Norwegian households, that there are fewer places and times to listen, thus explaining the drop.
The number of radio devices that can receive national radio stations has been reduced by almost 50% after the FM-switch off, according to the Digital Radio Survey, citing research from Kantar Media. Notably, though, according to the PPM survey (also Kantar Media) almost 3.7 million Norwegians listened weekly to radio in January 2018. That is only 44,000 less than in 2017. 2.6 million Norwegians listened to radio every day in January 2018, 463,000 fewer daily listeners compared to 2017, according to the same article.
“Our experience from the early switch off regions has shown that the listening figures drop at first, and they then start to rise again when consumers have had time to replace their FM radios,” said Torvmark, quoted in the same article.
Our correspondent in Norway doesn’t share the optimism of Mr. Torvmark. Eivind Engberg, whom we have quoted previously, thinks local FMs will be unprofitable with two–three years, and many of them will have to go dark. “It’s a really bad idea to shut down the FM system. Reason number one is clear: Every listener has access to many FM radio sets these days. So lesson number one is to not shut down the feed that can access millions of receivers and end-users,” writes Eivind. “The second reason: Don’t forget the end users. If they are not happy — then you’re out of business very soon. It’s the end-user that will decide the future distribution of radio — not the broadcasters. If the end-user loves the radio — don’t make him lose the signal so that he’s forced to find other workarounds…then the end-user might end up at Pandora or Spotify.”
Doug Irwin has yet to work on a project for a radio station in which money was not an object — and the same is probably true for you
This isn’t so much about technology as it is about techniques
If you are a broadcast engineer, your life has been a pin-ball game of rapid and random events that happen in a blink of the eye
The commission noted that much has changed in the local media marketplace between 1975 and 2017
Linux is a great operating system to use daily, but what do you do if you actually need to run a Windows application?
“SPOF” refers to a single point of failure and can be applied to almost system
Doug’s advice is to put your plant on “auto-pilot” to the extent possible
The FCC adopted rules in October to eliminate the requirement that broadcasters maintain a main studio in or around a station’s community of license